Statement:
ITF Dockers’ Section reaffirms campaign to stop the industrial abuses by
stevedoring operators seeking to automate
In response to reports that the ITF Dockers’ Section will
be supporting the ITF agreement with Ong Teng Cheong Labor Leadership Institute
(OTCi) of the Singapore National Trades Union Congress to research the future
of work and the impact it has on international transport workers Paddy Crumlin, ITF Dockers’ Section
Chair said today: “We’ve already done
our reviews and know that automation is driving union busting and workplace
deregulation in our industry.”
09/10/2018
“Over many decades the ITF
Dockers’ Section position has been consistent with terminal operators and
ship owners: if you make capital investments in automation, it must be
negotiated, appropriate protections for workers must be included with
realisable social dividends for working people and unions, and we have and will
absolutely reject any unilateral action by operators.”
“Historically dockers’ unions have been at the sharp end of
automation. We have seen jobs disappear, change and shift location, and
replaced by non-union workers. Dockers have good reason for scepticism and for
rejecting the latest round of technology as expensive, inflexible and not as
productive as people are. It amounts to not recognising and attacking our
rights, and the role that we have played in building productivity on the
international waterfront.”
“Automation is often used by the worst employers as part of
an ideological attack on dock workers, designed to undermine unions and their
members, and is commonly masqueraded by companies as a driver of productivity.”
Operators claim that automated machinery is more productive
but that is fake news and disinformation. The overwhelming evidence shows that
automated terminals are less productive and have far worse rates than in manual
terminals.
“We need to fight from the front and shape the debate about
automation. We welcome the latest round of genuine negotiations with some
affiliates agreeing on limits and criteria of application,” said Crumlin.
“We know that employers are reluctant to make capital
investments without subsidies that reduce risk and ensure profit. We know that
new technology leads to both progress and disruption, but we must ensure that
workers are protected, retrained, reskilled and that no jobs are put at risk.”
“Combatting this disingenuous approach to automation needs
international solidarity and cooperation from dockers’ unions around the globe.
We need to be united and not allow ourselves to be divided.”
“Automation is a highly politicised issue already for
dockers globally, and one that affects us all. The Dockers’ Section cannot see
a legitimate way of participating in the OTCi research, and no direct relevance
to us, given the conclusions we have reached and our ongoing automation
campaign," said Crumlin.
The ITF Dockers’ Section strongly supports the resolve of
dockers’ unions that we should campaign around the world, involving all unions,
to fight for our rights and for future generations of workers in our industry
to protect our jobs and come together.
“The ITF Dockers’ Section is committed to campaign and
drive the debate around automation. We need to use every industrial, political,
legal and commercial step at our disposal to protect hard fought wages and
conditions, decent work for our members, and the livelihoods of dockers’
families globally in the face of the industrial abuses being prosecuted by
stevedoring operators like ICTSI under this banner,” said Crumlin.
ITF General Secretary Steve
Cotton said that the undermining and the damage affected by some
international stevedoring companies has forced dock workers to commit to the
ITF campaign which rejects the use of automation to undermine dockers rights.
“This OTCi study has been carefully structured
so that it cannot be directed at the stevedoring industry where abuse is well
recognised and the ITF Dockers’ Section campaign is in place.”
“Instead the research aims to identify how technology,
artificial intelligence and the gig economy are impacting workers and
identifying long-term negative consequences to economic and community
standards.”
“The study is intended to empower workers and arm workers
with the skills to meet these new developments in a way that recognises their
labour rights and the great economic cost that follows when governments and
regulators sidestep their responsibilities to our working communities.”
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий